Welcome, Guest
Username: Password: Remember me
Questions about the "City Car Driving" website & forum

TOPIC: Thoughts

Re: Thoughts 08 Jun 2015 12:20 #46474

  • Spoutnik
  • Spoutnik's Avatar
  • OFFLINE
  • Guru
  • Build a wall
  • Posts: 1503
  • Thank you received: 225
Yes he did:

Violation of rules:

-2.1
-2.2

And I banned Lopezracing after he was banned by Jericho for the same reason, but he continued.
SPOUTNIK

Warning: Spoiler! [ Click to expand ]
The administrator has disabled public write access.

Re: Thoughts 08 Jun 2015 13:31 #46475

  • David02
  • David02's Avatar
  • OFFLINE
  • Global Moderator
  • David is the name, moderating is the game.
  • Posts: 6544
  • Thank you received: 1619
Spoutnik wrote:
Yes he did:

Violation of rules:

-2.1
-2.2

And I banned Lopezracing after he was banned by Jericho for the same reason, but he continued.
This isn't true. These offenses were made on him or her's various accounts. You can't continue a ban for something that never happened on that account.
Hello! My name is David, and here are some important things about me.

Contact Information
Warning: Spoiler! [ Click to expand ]


PC Specs
Warning: Spoiler! [ Click to expand ]


City Car Driving Information
Warning: Spoiler! [ Click to expand ]
The administrator has disabled public write access.

Re: Thoughts 08 Jun 2015 13:32 #46476

  • robotfool228
  • robotfool228's Avatar
  • OFFLINE
  • Guru
  • SUPER HAPPY FUN TIME EPIC PANCAKE DINNER PARTY
  • Posts: 582
  • Thank you received: 79
:dry: ... :dry: :unsure:
2015 Mazda CX-5 Sport w/ Nav. Not the most exciting, but definitely special to me.
The administrator has disabled public write access.

Re: Thoughts 08 Jun 2015 13:37 #46477

  • Spoutnik
  • Spoutnik's Avatar
  • OFFLINE
  • Guru
  • Build a wall
  • Posts: 1503
  • Thank you received: 225
David02 wrote:
Spoutnik wrote:
Yes he did:

Violation of rules:

-2.1
-2.2

And I banned Lopezracing after he was banned by Jericho for the same reason, but he continued.
This isn't true. These offenses were made on him or her's various accounts. You can't continue a ban for something that never happened on that account.

Yes it is (Jericho made a comment about it that can only be viewed by site admin/mods)
And rule 2.4 states that "the staff of this forum will determine weather your post was acceptable or not". Supporting a modder who posted porn in one of his accounts was determined unacceptable by Jericho and me.

Jericho comment Lopezracing.PNG


As it can be seen, Lopezracing was banned for supporting a modder who put porn in his fake mods. He continued after the temporary ban, which was the reason for the longer ban.
SPOUTNIK

Warning: Spoiler! [ Click to expand ]
Last Edit: 08 Jun 2015 14:18 by Spoutnik.
The administrator has disabled public write access.

Re: Thoughts 08 Jun 2015 22:36 #46486

  • simulationdude
  • simulationdude's Avatar
  • OFFLINE
  • Guru
  • American
  • Posts: 4475
  • Thank you received: 486
Spoutnik wrote:
David02 wrote:
Spoutnik wrote:
Yes he did:

Violation of rules:

-2.1
-2.2

And I banned Lopezracing after he was banned by Jericho for the same reason, but he continued.
This isn't true. These offenses were made on him or her's various accounts. You can't continue a ban for something that never happened on that account.

Yes it is (Jericho made a comment about it that can only be viewed by site admin/mods)
And rule 2.4 states that "the staff of this forum will determine weather your post was acceptable or not". Supporting a modder who posted porn in one of his accounts was determined unacceptable by Jericho and me.

Jericho comment Lopezracing.PNG


As it can be seen, Lopezracing was banned for supporting a modder who put porn in his fake mods. He continued after the temporary ban, which was the reason for the longer ban.
Just because Jericho did it doesn't mean its right.
CEO of Sim Forestry Company. Contact me on forum for job salary starts at
a decent 40k.


детские игрушки


AMD FX 6300 6-Core @ 3.5 Ghz
Nvidia Geforce GTX 750 Ti
16 GB DDR3 Ram
1 TB SSD
Logitech G25 and Logitech Driving Force GT
Windows 8.1
2 20 inch monitors (Buy me a third and i'll ship you a cookie expedited)
The administrator has disabled public write access.

Re: Thoughts 08 Jun 2015 22:40 #46487

  • Spoutnik
  • Spoutnik's Avatar
  • OFFLINE
  • Guru
  • Build a wall
  • Posts: 1503
  • Thank you received: 225
Warning: Spoiler! [ Click to expand ]


Okay, assume it wasn't right. His behavior was still unnaceptable (image you're a guest, a guy puts porn in his fake mod, you believe it's real because of Lopezracing, you download it, and you see porn? You will obviously never download mods from here again)
SPOUTNIK

Warning: Spoiler! [ Click to expand ]
The administrator has disabled public write access.

Re: Thoughts 08 Jun 2015 22:42 #46488

  • norro
  • norro's Avatar
  • OFFLINE
  • Guru
  • Posts: 350
  • Thank you received: 63
simulationdude wrote:
Just because Jericho did it doesn't mean its right.

I agree with Spoutnik though , he definitely should've been banned, it was not a mistake. I don't see what's your problem with that?
Last Edit: 08 Jun 2015 22:45 by norro.
The administrator has disabled public write access.

Re: Thoughts 09 Jun 2015 06:12 #46497

  • Stryder237
  • Stryder237's Avatar
  • OFFLINE
  • Guru
  • Posts: 1433
  • Thank you received: 82
About all this fake mod nonsense, I personally think it is really easy to tell if a mod is fake. If no one has posted before and had a poorly-worded post with awful grammar and no pictures or downloads it is so clearly fake. If I created a mod I would try hard to add nice pictures and a well-formatted post to get more people to download my mod I'd spent time on, rather than promising it in ten minutes using the grammar of a four-year old. So when you see a clearly fake mod, ignore it and the troll will go back under its bridge.

Oh, and Lopezracing was clearly either TGIFmodding or one of his/her friends, as no reasonable person would have believed TGIF's parody-levels of lies.
The administrator has disabled public write access.

Re: Thoughts 09 Jun 2015 07:01 #46499

  • simulationdude
  • simulationdude's Avatar
  • OFFLINE
  • Guru
  • American
  • Posts: 4475
  • Thank you received: 486
Spoutnik wrote:
Warning: Spoiler! [ Click to expand ]


Okay, assume it wasn't right. His behavior was still unnaceptable (image you're a guest, a guy puts porn in his fake mod, you believe it's real because of Lopezracing, you download it, and you see porn? You will obviously never download mods from here again)

It is still not on the rulebook as a crime to support someone, nor is it on the rules to have multiple accounts.
CEO of Sim Forestry Company. Contact me on forum for job salary starts at
a decent 40k.


детские игрушки


AMD FX 6300 6-Core @ 3.5 Ghz
Nvidia Geforce GTX 750 Ti
16 GB DDR3 Ram
1 TB SSD
Logitech G25 and Logitech Driving Force GT
Windows 8.1
2 20 inch monitors (Buy me a third and i'll ship you a cookie expedited)
The administrator has disabled public write access.

Re: Thoughts 09 Jun 2015 12:16 #46500

  • Spoutnik
  • Spoutnik's Avatar
  • OFFLINE
  • Guru
  • Build a wall
  • Posts: 1503
  • Thank you received: 225
simulationdude wrote:
Spoutnik wrote:
Warning: Spoiler! [ Click to expand ]


Okay, assume it wasn't right. His behavior was still unnaceptable (image you're a guest, a guy puts porn in his fake mod, you believe it's real because of Lopezracing, you download it, and you see porn? You will obviously never download mods from here again)

It is still not on the rulebook as a crime to support someone, nor is it on the rules to have multiple accounts.

Okay, but the rule 2.4 states that "the staff of this forum will determine wether your post is acceptable or not". Lopezracing's posts were considered unnaceptable, thus deleted. Furthermore, even though it is not a rule, we have permission to ban a copy of a banned user. Otherwise, what would be the point of a ban?

Stryder: I agree (that's why unknown modders are now required to post pictures)

PS: Kivlov banned Rusiken31 for stealing mods, even through it is not on the rulebook. When something is clearly not right, the user should be banned regardless of the rule book.
SPOUTNIK

Warning: Spoiler! [ Click to expand ]
Last Edit: 09 Jun 2015 18:23 by Spoutnik.
The administrator has disabled public write access.
Time to create page: 0.175 seconds